Back to Blog
AI

LLM Fine-Tuning Best Practices: Lessons from Production Systems

Practical guidance on when and how to fine-tune LLMs, based on real-world consulting experience with enterprise clients.

•3 min read
LLM Fine-Tuning Best Practices: Lessons from Production Systems

LLM Fine-Tuning Best Practices: Lessons from Production Systems

Fine-tuning LLMs is one of the most misunderstood aspects of AI engineering. Through consulting work with various clients, I've seen teams waste months on fine-tuning when prompt engineering would suffice—and others struggle with prompts when fine-tuning was clearly the right choice.

When to Fine-Tune (And When Not To)

Fine-Tune When:

  • You need consistent output formatting that prompts can't reliably achieve
  • Domain-specific terminology or style is critical
  • You have high-volume, repetitive tasks where per-token costs matter
  • Response latency is critical (smaller fine-tuned models can be faster)

Don't Fine-Tune When:

  • You haven't exhausted prompt engineering possibilities
  • Your requirements change frequently
  • You lack quality training data (garbage in = garbage out)
  • The base model already performs well with good prompts

The Fine-Tuning Process

1. Data Quality Over Quantity

The biggest mistake teams make is focusing on volume. 500 high-quality examples often outperform 5,000 mediocre ones.

Quality criteria:

  • Diversity: Cover edge cases and variations
  • Accuracy: Every example must be correct
  • Consistency: Formatting should be uniform
  • Relevance: Examples should match real-world use cases

2. Evaluation Framework First

Before training, establish how you'll measure success:

Evaluation Criteria:
- Accuracy: Does output match expected format?
- Relevance: Does content address the prompt?
- Style: Does tone match requirements?
- Safety: Are outputs appropriate?

Run the same evaluation on your base model to establish a baseline.

3. Iterative Training

Don't train once and deploy. Instead:

  1. Train on a subset of data
  2. Evaluate against holdout set
  3. Analyze failures
  4. Augment training data to address gaps
  5. Repeat

4. A/B Testing in Production

Even after fine-tuning looks good in evaluation, run A/B tests:

  • Route 10% of traffic to the fine-tuned model
  • Compare user satisfaction metrics
  • Monitor for unexpected behaviors
  • Gradually increase traffic as confidence grows

Common Pitfalls

Overfitting to Training Data

If your model performs great on similar inputs but fails on variations, you've overfit. Solutions:

  • More diverse training examples
  • Data augmentation techniques
  • Regularization during training

Catastrophic Forgetting

Fine-tuning can degrade general capabilities. Mitigate by:

  • Including general-purpose examples in training data
  • Using techniques like LoRA that preserve base weights
  • Testing general capabilities post-training

Ignoring Cost-Benefit

Fine-tuning has costs:

  • Data preparation time
  • Training compute costs
  • Ongoing maintenance as requirements change

Always calculate whether the investment makes sense compared to alternatives.

Real-World Example

For a client's customer support automation:

Initial approach: Prompt engineering with GPT-4

  • Worked well but costly at scale
  • Some inconsistent formatting

Fine-tuned solution: GPT-3.5-turbo fine-tuned on 2,000 curated examples

  • 70% cost reduction
  • More consistent output format
  • Slightly lower quality on edge cases (acceptable trade-off)

The key was starting with prompts to understand the problem, then fine-tuning once requirements stabilized.

Conclusion

Fine-tuning is a powerful tool, but it's not always the right one. Start with prompt engineering, establish clear success metrics, and only fine-tune when the benefits clearly outweigh the costs. When you do fine-tune, invest in data quality and iterate based on real-world performance.